記者會
1.1
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
85 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
85 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
85 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
85 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
85 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
85 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Repetitively nota sin sin trades from WoBuPa<br />
-- 85 賽季 8 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Repetitively nota sin sin trades from WoBuPa<br />
-- 85 賽季 8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0