Basın toplantısı

Oyun haberleri: Plans of updating match engine
-- 80 S 58 g.
Plans of the Match engine update!
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+14
Very good ideas... I hope it will be done as soon as possible even if I understand it takes some time. -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+4
两个赛季完成比赛引擎的更新是否太快？现有球队的实力可能会被发生反转，但是球队重新训练出适应比赛引擎的球员至少需要5赛季以上的时间。
Is it too fast to complete the game engine update in two seasons? The strength of the existing team may be reversed, but it will take at least five seasons for the team to retrain players to adapt to the game engine. -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+4
good good my short 180cm players will be beasts -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+5
Dx too -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
What GM wants to change, we can only adapt, I have no opinion, but I have the same opinion as God. You asked us to adapt to your changes for two seasons. It's really too fast for our team to adapt immediately. You can think about it. We spent 15 seasons training players to adapt to the previous games, and then you changed everything in two seasons. Is that reasonable? -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+3
If GM sticks to the idea of two seasons, there is nothing we can do. But at least I will not buy credit points in the future, never! -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+4
I wish you all the best in your development of the game. Thank you for searching ways to make the game better! -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+3
Although I may be the beneficiary of the amendment, I still think GM should be cautious about it. I have always stressed this point. This game needs a long training process. You can change the rules of the game in a whimsical way. But as a club operator, the bigger the boat we build, the harder it will be to turn it around. -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+4
Just outrageous -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+2
I like the suggestions, so keep up the good work! -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+5
Why do you complain? We don't even know what changes there will be, so we don't know if we'll have to change something in the teams or not...and still, if the changes will go (as I hope) in the direction of correcting bugs and absurd things, you can't complain that you have to change: that would be like admitting that you had undue advantages for many seasons! -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+9
The real adaptation begins only when the match engine is integrated into the world leagues.
Even after an update there is a high possibility that we will need to do some quick balancing changes.

No matter how long we test the match engine - the real test begins when it is fully used in the most important leagues of the game.

Even if we postpone working on this update for 5 seasons we would have similar problems.

That is the reason why updating the match engine was never our “favorite” update to choose. But we will respect the community's votes and we also believe that the match engine can be significantly improved.

By the way, right now we are working only with the first stage. The work on the second stage depends not only on us but on the community as well. So if the community does not support this via investment area we might not have these updates so quickly. -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+2
YAOQINWEI you always have a possibility to go to 3-4 WL, to tank here for 10 seasons, and go back to 1 WL. We know you have an experience on this :) -- 80 S 58 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+8
It's like table tennis. ridiculous. -- 80 S 59 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
如果脑子不好，怎么改，都没用! -- 80 S 59 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
A dog is afraid of losing and is eager to jump over the wall -- 80 S 59 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
As I said on dischord, when doing the rebalancing, please make sure all offensive tactical settings have an optimal way to defend them, and vice versa all defensive settings an optimal way to attack.

At this moment, despite some settings are not being useful, there're always 2 or 3 possible ways to attack & defend. I.e. If fast breaks become more relevant - there should be a defense to counter-it.

This is what gives depth to the game, and permits winning in spite of not having best players, avoids a single way of playing, you need to change and adapt tactical settings depending on the teams you are facing... -- 80 S 59 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+8
Adding to nofixations post: Allow setting switching to different tactics based on parameters such as down by x points, or a critical player has foul trouble, etc. If you add 3 new tactics, the chances to correctly call the counter to opponent will be quite low. Base the actual changes on coaches skills -- 80 S 60 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
It would be great if fatigue system was updated as it does not make sense 8 players are enough to finish the season without any problem, considering their health is 100%. -- 81 S 1 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+2
Only 8? You can do fine with 6 players in WL1 if you have read help section around 500 times. -- 81 S 1 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+2