Basın toplantısı

Icon Takas/Kiralık oyuncular: Los Pollos & Kinder
-- 68 S 2 g.
Team made a trade offer
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 68 S 2 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 68 S 2 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Takas teklifi kabul edildi -- 68 S 2 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Basın mesajı federasyon gönüllüsü veya başkanı tarafından gizlenmiş -- 68 S 3 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
This trade has already been reviewed and accepted by the FTC. -- 68 S 7 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+3
(Y) I applaude Your wisdom and consistency. -- 68 S 7 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
I seize the opportunity to say, once again, that Muli Trieste are not interested in participating into any trade, given the current mood of the market.
So, don't bother asking, you all.
(I post this message because after the new implementation, there no more an option to tag players as "not tradeable". Sorry if it is a nuisance) -- 68 S 10 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
:D no longer leader of FTC, but please tell me why this trade should be vetoed? Maybe by managers that don’t know how things work? My guess is you will say potential? At age 29 the 9 potential will not make much difference, the player with less potential has 100% health and next season will not be in decline like the four potential, over the course of the two seasons these two player have left on their contracts, there is verily little difference. One can play as a tall PG in WL2 (the four potential), which can be an advantage at times, while the other cannot. Some managers are just quick to find faults and complain I guess when things have been thought over a lot. -- 68 S 10 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+3
yes, main reason , why he trade , is that he need PG and kiljunen can play good for that position https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Zaidejas-statistika-1585100_Joki_Kiljunen.htm . -- 68 S 10 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
Players will never be exact, always some lee way, there is no “gifting” players in this situation, absolute legitimate trade. -- 68 S 10 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
I need a proofreader :D Should have stated "the player with less potential has 100% health and next season will not be in decline like the ***NINE*** potential player, -- 68 S 11 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0