Press conference

Icon Trejd/Lending players: Hi5 & Virtuozai
-- 103 S 1 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Igrač:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 103 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Igrač:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 103 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 103 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 103 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
why someone bothers to report this trade to FPC, if FPC voted on tens and tens of cases that trade for salary reduce is ok? -- 103 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0

These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
7 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)

1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations:
--- Salary drop. Pot6 is not enough to compensate other player value for WL1 teams ( see trade for reference : https://www.basketpulse.com/es/Trade/information/1250301. On top of it, It is surprising and ethically wrong someone that complains publicly about other people's trades does an even worse one."
 -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Why one teams can trade for salary drops and others cannot? -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
Sabotage against the community? Should we all quit the game? -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+3