conferência de imprensa
4.5
Community's training settings for U18s!
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+4
1.1
As an ex u16 nt coach and scout for Polish U18 players I can say that health training for young players is the worst thing you could do for your national team and not necessarily good for your team. It is worth mentioning that it is a long-term investment and you are spending the best time for training skills on skill with no immediate benefits especially when there is no inner potential in health. It takes around 8 seasons(depending on potential) to gain actual benefits from additional training points and in that age injuries aren't a problem. So besides rare cases no benefits from rewards no benefits for nt u16 and u18 and u21. When you start gaining benefits from this training it is around the time when you need to sign a contract for a sum that isn't financially benefiting you and the player should be around time to play in the first team, not in the young team where you can cut cost.
So I would say training health is only good when you have a good inner in it or you have a player that you want to be in your team no matter what the cost till the end of his career. -- 96 T 23 d.
So I would say training health is only good when you have a good inner in it or you have a player that you want to be in your team no matter what the cost till the end of his career. -- 96 T 23 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+3
1.1
Really good write-ups. I like to read all the different approaches to team building both long term & short term. Thanks for sharing folks.
--
96 T
23 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+1
3.1
Some factors influence training age, potential, and strength of opponent in a played game. Taking an improvement jump slows potential and makes the difference between opponents smaller so it makes your player better but slows his growth, theoretically, players should end on the same level but in fact, if your player outgrows his league he will get less from improvement jump than from normal training. Improvement jump works fine if you are going to play in a better league next season but otherwise, it is slightly worse than normal training. It could be a nice tool to use on players that have long contracts but you don't plan/ have money to extend or the player who is playing in the youth team but is an almost first-squad player or if you want to build strong nt in u21,u18,u16 categories or gain financial bonus from rewards. But in the pure training aspect and making players be at their peak, normal training is a more stable and better thing.
--
96 T
24 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+1
1.1
Without improvement jumps wouldn´t I be reducing the "shelf life" of a first team player? Let´s say with improvement jump I would have him in great form for 8 seasons and without for 6-7 seasons?
--
96 T
24 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0
It good argument for taking improvement jump but still it doesn't necessary mean that taking it will give longer 'shelf life'. It depends on age of player, his health and how much potential he lost and how he looks compared to opponents he is facing. Financial aspects are also worth considering because what if your player have longer peak if he needs to end career earlier because nobody is willing to pay for him. And this is there'd mainly focused on u18 so I would say unless it is jump to change player from young team to 20 minutes + main team it is waste of potential only exception if you gain promotion back to back or it is very small potential loss. Of course I'm taking in account that you have at least average development coach.
--
96 T
24 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0
1.1