Конференција за штампа
Тргување/размена/Играчи ставени за позајмица:
Тимот на клубот даде понуда за тргување/размена
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
76 С
4 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
76 С
4 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
76 С
4 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
76 С
4 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
5.8
Ова тргување/разменување беше пријавено како нефер. Сепак, Фер плеј комисијата одлучи дека ова тргување/разменување е фер.
--
76 С
5 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young school talent (10pot) traded for good (8pot) player and random 6pot is not very high return. Should be at least similar level talent added in return for such school player.<br />
-- 76 С 5 д
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young school talent (10pot) traded for good (8pot) player and random 6pot is not very high return. Should be at least similar level talent added in return for such school player.<br />
-- 76 С 5 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/986363
So crazy
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+3
An 8-potential+6-potential can be exchanged for a 10-potential Miao. This is the privilege of one's own officials in North Korea. Where is fairness?
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+3
Nesikisu as i mainus, bet cia jau net man gaila CO. tureciau tyleti nes Benio zaideja turiu pasiskolines, mainai neliecia manes, bet procentaliai ar cia nedidesnis salary dropas? ir gaunamas 10 pot zaidejas. Negrazu net man tokie mainai.
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+3
Nesikisu as i mainus, bet cia jau net man gaila CO.
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+2
I think FPC has a problem of double standarts. If somebody asks me, I would say that this trade is fair. Why should we care about 10pot midget? But on other hand: a lot of similiar looking trades have been reverted.
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+1
Maybe it's time to create FPC² to control FPC
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+10
Good idea !!!
--
76 С
6 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+1
2.2