Preses konference
Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji:
Komanda izteica maiņas darījuma piedāvājumu
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma
--
84 S
7 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma
--
84 S
7 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma
--
84 S
7 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
5.10
Šis darījums tika ziņots kā negodīgs. Tomēr, Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir godīgs.
--
84 S
8 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 8 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 8 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0