Preses konference

Icon Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji: HHADXJLD & Staniunai
-- 79 S 32 d.
Komanda izteica maiņas darījuma piedāvājumu
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs:
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma -- 79 S 32 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs:
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma -- 79 S 32 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Maiņas darījums tika akceptēts -- 79 S 32 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Maiņas darījumu atcēla Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) -- 79 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir negodīgs un abas darījumā iesaistītās komandas saņēma brīdinājumus. -- 79 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 11<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young high potential is not worth old guy<br />
--- Old player 1s contract for high potential youngster with long contract..<br />
--- Talent level of players involved is too far apart. Trade needs to involved another player or two to make the talent gap closer.<br />
-- 79 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0