Spaudos konferencija
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
79 sez.
32 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
79 sez.
32 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Mainų pasiūlymas priimtas
--
79 sez.
32 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
"Sąžiningo žaidimo" komiteto sprendimu mainai buvo anuliuoti
--
79 sez.
33 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai yra nesąžiningi ir komandos yra įspėjamos.
--
79 sez.
33 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 11<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young high potential is not worth old guy<br />
--- Old player 1s contract for high potential youngster with long contract..<br />
--- Talent level of players involved is too far apart. Trade needs to involved another player or two to make the talent gap closer.<br />
-- 79 sez. 33 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 11<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young high potential is not worth old guy<br />
--- Old player 1s contract for high potential youngster with long contract..<br />
--- Talent level of players involved is too far apart. Trade needs to involved another player or two to make the talent gap closer.<br />
-- 79 sez. 33 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0