Spaudos konferencija
Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas:
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
5.3
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
12 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
12 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
12 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
12 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
"Sąžiningo žaidimo" komiteto sprendimu mainai buvo anuliuoti
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai yra nesąžiningi ir komandos yra įspėjamos.
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 7<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
4 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- This trade is extremely unbalanced.<br />
-- 74 sez. 14 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 7<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
4 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- This trade is extremely unbalanced.<br />
-- 74 sez. 14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Tai kaip man issikeist zaidejus? Kokias cia nesamones darot? Jai as noriu atleist savo zaideja bet brangu tai geriau pasiimsiu lavonus ir atleisiu po savaites. Tai db isvis hu*ne kaskokia. Abi puses buvo patenkintos ir aktyvus zaidejai...
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+6
First of all, the player which you think is to good for me is 70% health and badly trained. And those SG players who you think is "trash", was really important for me in this season. But i was ready to tank my season so i can raise more high pot players, and that player is gonna need all season to get his health to 80%. I admit that player vise those 3 player don't match the one i got, but the i have a question for you, do player who is going to BANKRUPT can try to do something about it? Nobody is going to give him a good pot player (unless old one) for that SF, cause he is overpaid and unhealthy. So this trade was desperate for the team.
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+1
Looks like FPC messed up...
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+1
seen the same story last season with NORDDOG team. Got 2 or 3 trades reverted before he was able to trade out player he did not needed 
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/972357
--
74 sez.
14 d.
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/972357
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
22 years 9 pot isn't the same as messed up 25 year old 8 pot
--
74 sez.
14 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0