Spaudos konferencija

Icon Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas: Los Pollos & Kinder
-- 68 sez. 2 d.
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
Žaidėjas:
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje -- 68 sez. 2 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
Žaidėjas:
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje -- 68 sez. 2 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
Mainų pasiūlymas priimtas -- 68 sez. 2 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
Spaudos konferencijos žinutė paslėpta (federacijos savanorio arba administratoriaus) -- 68 sez. 3 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
This trade has already been reviewed and accepted by the FTC. -- 68 sez. 7 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+3
(Y) I applaude Your wisdom and consistency. -- 68 sez. 7 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+1
I seize the opportunity to say, once again, that Muli Trieste are not interested in participating into any trade, given the current mood of the market.
So, don't bother asking, you all.
(I post this message because after the new implementation, there no more an option to tag players as "not tradeable". Sorry if it is a nuisance)
-- 68 sez. 10 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+1
:D no longer leader of FTC, but please tell me why this trade should be vetoed? Maybe by managers that don’t know how things work? My guess is you will say potential? At age 29 the 9 potential will not make much difference, the player with less potential has 100% health and next season will not be in decline like the four potential, over the course of the two seasons these two player have left on their contracts, there is verily little difference. One can play as a tall PG in WL2 (the four potential), which can be an advantage at times, while the other cannot. Some managers are just quick to find faults and complain I guess when things have been thought over a lot. -- 68 sez. 10 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+3
yes, main reason , why he trade , is that he need PG and kiljunen can play good for that position https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Zaidejas-statistika-1585100_Joki_Kiljunen.htm . -- 68 sez. 10 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+1
Players will never be exact, always some lee way, there is no “gifting” players in this situation, absolute legitimate trade. -- 68 sez. 10 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+1
I need a proofreader :D Should have stated "the player with less potential has 100% health and next season will not be in decline like the ***NINE*** potential player, -- 68 sez. 11 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0