Spaudos konferencija
Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas:
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
3 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
74 sez.
3 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Mainų pasiūlymas priimtas
--
74 sez.
3 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
By the time of trade, if I recall correctly, it was over 2 months ago, I was looking for a second(supporting PG) with a good experience to avoid mistakes in game, and I had 2 better 3pt shooters in my traded player's position, so I didn't need him in my team, after a trade I realized that this player is too weak even for a second PG, so I had to fire him. I don't know who is digging into my old trades, but all of them were fair.
--
75 sez.
28 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+2
a trade this old cannot be reverted either way, don't even trip.
--
75 sez.
28 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+2
2.2
V1ctus has some enemies, that's what you get when you go against the system
--
75 sez.
28 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+1
Buvo pranešta, kad šie mainai gali būti nesąžiningi. Visgi Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai sąžiningi.
--
75 sez.
29 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 12<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
-- 75 sez. 29 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 12<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
-- 75 sez. 29 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0