記者會
1.1
交易/出借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
91 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
91 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
91 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
91 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
91 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1
Trade is reported.
So my explanation is simple. Just standard trade - several solid players for one better. My players have peak 275-307. Delmas has 345 (but only 90% health). All players in this trade have bad inner potential for health. And all have solid other potentials. Delmas is big, that´s what I like him. He is 3pt shooter. And I have many young prospects. So I want less and better players. I think it is good trade for both teams. -- 91 賽季 4 天
So my explanation is simple. Just standard trade - several solid players for one better. My players have peak 275-307. Delmas has 345 (but only 90% health). All players in this trade have bad inner potential for health. And all have solid other potentials. Delmas is big, that´s what I like him. He is 3pt shooter. And I have many young prospects. So I want less and better players. I think it is good trade for both teams. -- 91 賽季 4 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
91 賽季
5 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 14<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
-- 91 賽季 5 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 14<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
-- 91 賽季 5 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0