記者會
1.1
交易/出借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1
Trade I made was flagged for unfair. I get why it can look that way as I traded a pot8 but the two players traded have no real future on my team. Needed a vet big to help back up my two starter bigs plus I'll save about 5K this year with the deal. I have been contacted by FPC and national members to express how this trade is one sided for a long term perspective. After those talks I understand why this trade will be rescinded/terminated. Thank you to the FPC for input and those members who pointed out the issue with my deal.
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
pasiieškok ožių savam rate :)
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
交易已被公平遊戲委員會撤銷
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Very unbalanced trade. <br />
--- <br />
--- Trade is disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 79 賽季 33 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Very unbalanced trade. <br />
--- <br />
--- Trade is disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 79 賽季 33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Who can explain to me. What is the meaning of reason: "Suspicion that trade's goal is to help one of the teams"? Which of these teams helps the other team?
--
79 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1