記者會
交易/出借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
74 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
74 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
74 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
74 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1
此筆交易無法退回，因為已超出期限。
--
75 賽季
16 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
75 賽季
16 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 75 賽季 16 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 75 賽季 16 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Hello, colleagues.
Probably, it is a kind of misunderstanding.
Yes I have traded a stronger and cheaper player. But first of all, the Trade was proposed from other side. I'v just accept it, when analyzed. I have enough budget (on the day of the Trade), so the money was not the issue for me. This Argentinian player was not important for me, because I had a several national players on that position. I usually tried to play with national belarussian players.
And the last, but the most important - now I'm searching for very youg talented palyers. And the major point of this Trade for me - was 15-y.o. Croatian player (Claric), which I needed.
So I ensure all of us - there is no any intention even to think about unfair moves.
Thanks for understanding. -- 75 賽季 16 天
Probably, it is a kind of misunderstanding.
Yes I have traded a stronger and cheaper player. But first of all, the Trade was proposed from other side. I'v just accept it, when analyzed. I have enough budget (on the day of the Trade), so the money was not the issue for me. This Argentinian player was not important for me, because I had a several national players on that position. I usually tried to play with national belarussian players.
And the last, but the most important - now I'm searching for very youg talented palyers. And the major point of this Trade for me - was 15-y.o. Croatian player (Claric), which I needed.
So I ensure all of us - there is no any intention even to think about unfair moves.
Thanks for understanding. -- 75 賽季 16 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1