Communiqué de presse
:
team_news_1
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Le joueur a changé d'équipe suite à un échange (BC Žvėrys)
--
63 S
27 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Le joueur a changé d'équipe suite à un échange (BC Žvėrys)
--
63 S
27 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Le joueur a changé d'équipe suite à un échange (BC Žvėrys)
--
63 S
27 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Mmmmmm........
--
63 S
27 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
2.2
1.1
3x1....
--
63 S
28 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
+0
This kind of trade have really few sense, a thing is save money, another is gift players.... Over 100 RT difference in One way direction is a gift, if you need Save only Just Fire one....
If trade system should be reorganized probably a Total RT limit should be implemented in new rules -- 63 S 28 j.
If trade system should be reorganized probably a Total RT limit should be implemented in new rules -- 63 S 28 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+0
Trades of Lithuanians and Chinese are similar for the rest of the communities of the game
--
63 S
28 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+2
I hesitated in getting into this but want to say first of all total rate wouldn't take into affect of age/potential/position/salary. I agree with joancrumor. What it is, is a team that made the top 16 but with little chance to promote dumping salary and getting a player that could be useful next season if they are able to keep him and another team that traded away a player that could help next season and a decent prospect for an old player and 2 players that won't help as much next season. Sometimes trades are made for reasons of next season. As far as dumping salaries, I would much prefer to get a couple potentially useful players at less cost than just plain dumping players. In fact sometimes there is more savings with a trade than there is by dumping players. I repeat, I completely agree with joancrumor. A lot of you all cry foul when you lack the insight and background information of the trade.
--
63 S
28 j.
--
(Traduire)
(Traduire EN)
+2