Club's information

Franchise player Wilt Chamberlain Jr.

340 RT

Age: 26 y.

Height: 218 cm.

Basketball Emperor Chamberlain

Local name: 篮球皇帝张伯伦

1.1

Manager: david1992

W. Chamberlain Jr.

Points: 11,8

D. Chen

Rebounds: 6,0

H. Ma

Assists: 2,6

Information

Activity	2025-03-28 09:18
Country	China
Federation	秩序联盟
Short club name	Big Dipper (Wilt)
Earlier managed club	Basketball Emperor Chamberlain (55 - 69 S)
Basketball school	Big Dipper Basketball school
Youth team	Basketball Emperor Chamberlain

Rankings

Strongest in the game	31 ( place in rankings)
Strongest in nat. league	7 ( place in rankings)
Strongest in int. league	19 ( place in rankings)
RT average	350
Fan club	3214
Fan ranking	11 ( place in rankings)
Pop. rating in int. league	7 ( place in rankings)
Image	7/7
Personnel's opinion	6/7

Statistics

Weekly income from sponsors	258082 Eu
Max sum for personnel's salaries	1318794 Eu
Trades restrictions' level	10 (History)
Trades done overall	129
Trades made this season	7
Overall wins/matches played	706/1144 62%
Season's wins/matches played	19/50 38%
Amount of borrowed players	4

1.1 1.1 Big Dipper

Coach: Rao Re (RT: 134)

-- 103 S 59 d.

The coach accepted the contract, offered by your club

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 Big Dipper

Coach: Gordon Ball (RT: 141)

-- 103 S 58 d.

The coach accepted the contract, offered by your club

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

Game's news: Season 102 review!

-- 103 S 1 d.

Season 102 review!

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 5.14 MikeHoudini

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC." - Does this also mean that there'll be fixes for the significant issues that encourage those intentional losses? -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 keepsmile

the news make a mistake,the MVP of the 102 season in wl1 is Mad Ghost,not Honda Muponda who is only the 60'day MVP -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 keepsmile

有人故意输球就可以说是测试战术，有人就不行，反正一切是裁判说了算，打不赢，我还＂吹"不赢你吗 -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

keepsmile, thanks, fixed. -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 5.8 LittleMister

Is it possible that with the new training page it is not possible to adjust the training of a newly acquired player (market, scout or draft) on the first day?
Do I have to wait until the first training report to make my settings? -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 3.3 d0man

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC. We encourage the community to report intentionally lost matches by selecting the cheating team and pressing report unfair behaviour on its page."
A nice instant of making it advantageous to win we will punish players for going what is better for team...
Can't we really implement something that makes winning worth it?
You win fast you receive less money, worse training, or an advantage to play in a league where you don't have chances to earn money.
You intentionally play longer to maximise benefits or losses because you can't financially pay to play in a higher league now FPC punishes you. If you try a new tactic and lose miserable FPC will punish you.

I don't support losing on purpose but if there are no benefits in winning it should be the manager's decision what to do not FPS or Administration. You have many examples of similar cases even in real life where clubs cant cope financially and choose to not get promoted higher. Or when they send their younglings when they don't want to win. -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+27

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

Little mister, thanks for pointing it out, there seemed to be a bug, now it should be ok. -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 3.1 ulipulido

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC."
I told about this last season and the answer was: IT'S NOT IMPORTANT, WE HAVE MORE IMPORTAN THINGS TO FOCUS
Well, maybe I have right. In Spanish WL2, after semifinals ALL TEAMS wanted to lose, because promote to Spanish WL1 is a punish to us. The matches between NL1 and NL2 the same, people are trying his best for lose that matches.
Maybe, solving the issues about WHY is better to stay in NL2 than promote NL1 is the ANSWER, not FPC -- 103 S 1 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+12

Y 2 zurda10

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 david1992

I just lent my player from the youth team today, and now I cannot change the training for him. -- 103 S 2 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 2.1 klinx

Since years, we ask to give money to every team in NL, Giv less to the first places to just give something to the last ones. So we would fight to stay in the higher league. Financial part of the game is realy huge, and you never want to get 0 from NL1 while people in NL2 can get money being weaker. That's just a non sens ! Just give money to everyone !! That's EASY, SIMPLE, and that's going to solve your "problem" -- 103 S 2 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

3.3 5.12 TheWizard

The way the system is now, the National League should just be eliminated. The post about staying in NL2 is better than going to NL1 ( since your finish in NL1 is impossible to be in the top money making positions is near impossible ) is spot on. NL seems to be just a burden. -- 103 S 2 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

3.2 4.5 PonasKukas

Klinx, this is what’s known as a collective action problem. It occurs when individuals rely on others to take action, avoiding contribution themselves. As a result, too few people voice the need for change (its not enough for you to say that there is a problem), leading to a suboptimal outcome for the group—in this case, the community. That’s why it’s important for more members of this community to act collectively rather than voicing issues individually. -- 103 S 2 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I just had NL promotion game where both teams was trying to lose and I was the one who failed to do that. Which team should be punished for this game? -- 103 S 2 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I'm playing this game for so long but recent administration actions is blowing my mind with a combination of their inability to solve current problems and a talent to create new problems as well.
Now the game is made, that sometimes losing is way better for the team and instead of changing this dumb system we will punish the users trying to make the best for their team?

For intentional WL losses just make a payout due fast series of expensive tickets, instead of average, as it was suggested 50 seasons ago already. Other intentional losses in the group stage to help a friend or whatever can be punished if there is enough evidences that it was intentional.
NL is a bit different, but its possible to find a solution there as well. And we should look for that solution how to encourage teams to win not because being afraid of getting punished, but because there should be some benefits of winning.
Community is talking about this issue FOR YEARS and nothing was changed. Now nothing was changed too, but somehow administration decided that it would be a great idea to punish users, while administration is responsible for this system we currently have. This is ridiculous. Did administration ever considered punishing themselves for their ignorance of problems community keeps saying them? What about having a discussion to find out actual solutions for problems we have instead of threats banning everybody who actually cares about this game? If Darius have no idea how to communicate with customers maybe somebody else should try? -- 103 S 3 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+19

3.1 3.3 a-darius

We and the community have slightly different priorities for updates.

One of the biggest factors in how we choose our priorities is our resources. For example, we have more resources to update old pages since we use our freelance developer for that. However, we have far fewer opportunities to work on sensitive topics such as finances or match engine updates.

Another factor is the size of the update. In this case, the community often underestimates the effort required. There are no quick updates when it comes to finances, and there should not be any rushed changes that affect finances for all teams.

Another factor is what we actually want to achieve. Will a finance system update drastically change the game? Will it significantly improve BasketPulse's chances of surviving another year? Will it reduce server issues? Will it attract new users? Will it introduce new possible actions for users?

I agree that such an update would be great and the right way to solve these issues. However, I don’t see any possibility of working on this soon.

You’re saying this is a design flaw and that we should allow complete freedom. Look at the NBA—even such a big organization has "design flaws" and fixes them with "fines." For example, teams risk penalties if they allow their star players to skip games without a good reason.

By the way, that won’t solve the problem, but maybe we should eliminate NT promotion games altogether? If both teams are trying to lose, is there really a point in having them? -- 103 S 3 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

2.2 3.1 zurda10

I don't know how much are the prizes of NL1 because I never reached one, and I'm aware that they change depending on league strength, but I know that the winner of our NL2 gets around 55k prize.
Would it really make such a big difference (that can't be adjusted over the season by market offer-demand) to make the Last teams in NL2 earn from ⅓ to an ⅛ part of those 55k (or whatever the TOP prize is in lower league)or something like that?
It wouldn't still pay off too much but at least you get something. I don't think anyone here is asking that the 12th of NL1 gets similar or more than 1st of NL2, just some incentive to promote.

WL doesn't have that issue because even if you finish last after promotion (don't get prize) it really pays off (or at least the loss is minimal compared to NL) just by the tickets income (bigger interest) and the new sponsors. -- 103 S 3 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 3.1 Szulim

This whole idea of punishing community and managers for intentional loss is just stupid. Everybody knows that BasketPulse besides bringing fun of managing your own team - it's business (or should be).
So why the administration are deaf to community and instead of making good changes and encourage new members - they just going downhill and making this game stripped of fun.
And at then end they are supriced that they have more inactive managers then new ones. Shocking -- 103 S 3 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 4.6 barbabodom

The coaches system is completely broken after the drop in skills due to age was implemented. -- 103 S 6 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

Show hidden replies: 19

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Personally, I'm not happy with some of the recent changes to the game myself, but why it should be more fun when non-competitive play and contest distortion should be allowed is beyond me

Szulim.

I can understand the frustration with the financial iniquities (especially the unbalanced funding in some National Leagues) that are mentioned here.

a-Darius has also emphasized that they simply don't have the capacity for a more constructive solution at the moment, because there are constantly new trouble spots that distract from the actual issues. -- 103 S 12 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 2.2 jiasyuan

所以近距離要更新了嗎？ -- 103 S 57 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 2.1 Rarz09

I'm no longer surprised by anything in this game with its fair play committee, even less transparency when it comes to justifying a canceled exchange... and now with this thing about them punishing with the loss of matches... I think that nowadays if you fart in this game you get a 100k fine, just for anything. -- 103 S 57 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 Big Dipper

Player: Leonard Francetic (RT: 355)

-- 103 S 56 d.

The player accepted the contract, offered by your club

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

1.1 1.1 Big Dipper

Player: Weice Sima (RT: 60)

-- 103 S 56 d.

Club signed contract with scout's player

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

World League.1.1	x 2
Zhongguo.1.1	x 1
National U21	China U21
National Men	China Men

Club's information

Basketball Emperor Chamberlain

Local name: 篮球皇帝张伯伦

Information

Rankings

Statistics

Major achievements

103 Season

102 Season

Club's information

Basketball Emperor Chamberlain

Local name: 篮球皇帝张伯伦

Information

Rankings

Statistics

Major achievements

103 Season

102 Season

Quickguide

Report this post