Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: ASKDaugava & Banana
-- 79 S 26 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
 -- 79 S 26 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0