Press conference
Feedback about team that borrowed player:
the team give my player 0min for the third time. so I let him back.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Lended player came back 
Unknown player
--
61 S
19 d.
Unknown player
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This is ridiculous. He could not play in local league due to number of foreign players. He was playing in world league for 19 minutes and had a role in my team. Only because of the 40 minutes in 4 days rule (played 39.2) and because of the fact that we had 2 National League games during that time player was recalled. Never received any notice from owner about playing time, so this recalling is one side decision only.
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
1.1
Never borrow players if you cannot give them playing time in both leagues :))
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
First of all there was no demands from the owner. If he ever wrote about it I could adjust my strategy.
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Actually, he doesn't need to give demands that player should play more than 0 minutes, let alone 3 times. + at worst, you could ask if you can do such thing. The whole purpose of loaning the player is to know that he will get many minutes for him to become better and more experienced.
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+4
Benislovas, your strategy is shame. Better use player in youth team, but not borrowing to you. If player didn't play, he gets less eff training, zero exp...
--
61 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+9