Pressemitteilung

Icon Trade/Spieler leihen: NGJEmperor & Fateseeker
-- 93 S 34 T.
Eine Mannschaft hat einen Trade angeboten.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Spieler:
Spielt nach einem Trade in einer neuen Mannschaft -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Spieler: Yu-Hsing Liu
Spielt nach einem Trade in einer neuen Mannschaft -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Spieler: Tzu-Hao Zheng
Spielt nach einem Trade in einer neuen Mannschaft -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Spieler:
Spielt nach einem Trade in einer neuen Mannschaft -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Spieler:
Spielt nach einem Trade in einer neuen Mannschaft -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Tradeangebot akzeptiert -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Due to have no chance to be top3 , these draft players are unnecessary, reduce salary and get 2 POT7 school players are the best choice for my team. In the other hand, NGJohnnyEmperor get 2 strong players so that he can try to stay in WL3.
This is a win-win trade. -- 93 S 34 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+4
The target of the trade is get the contract salary>17500/week player, because I want to protect Bamba from waive by system because bankruptcy -- 93 S 35 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+1
Dieser Trade wurde als unfair gemeldet. Der Fairplay-Ausschuss hat jedoch entschieden, dass dieser Trade fair ist. -- 93 S 35 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 12<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
 -- 93 S 35 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
trasgame You deliberately pick up an expensive player so that the bankruptcy process removes that very player? Do I understand this correctly?
Honestly, I don't even think that will work for you in the end.

Are these the kind of arguments that make for fair trade?
For me, this is circumventing the rules of the game and taking advantage of bugs. I don't think it's meant to be that way.

Sorry, but I don't get it. Maybe someone can explain it to me. -- 93 S 37 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
Idk i don't think that it's an issue because it's not even a bug, just a part of the game events.
BUT this looks like a very stupid trade for the Taiwan guy. If he wanted to take a 17.5k salary guy he didnt needed to give away two 7 pot picks. He had a great situation in his last 16 group at the time so I don't think that getting a good players was important for him so it's really not a big deal to just give away a cheaper player (specially with a 1 season contract) for any more expensive player when the tradeline is near. If he sees at least one of the players he got from the trade would change everything, but judgint from his comment after this trade it looked like he only cared about getting a more expensive player.
Anyway I'm not saying this is an illegal trade and that the FPC should have made a different decision. I think Cyseric definitely has won this trade in any means (even if the young guys have some sort of inside potential problems) but this is just a part of the game and this is the way it goes. -- 93 S 37 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+0
有趣的討論 -- 93 S 44 T.
-- (Übersetze) (Übersetze EN)
+3