新闻发布中心
2.1
交易/租借球员:
球队提出了交易报价
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易完成后效力新球队
--
93 季
28 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易完成后效力新球队
--
93 季
28 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易完成后效力新球队
--
93 季
28 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
2.2
交易被公平竞争委员会撤销
--
93 季
33 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
公平竞赛委员会决定交易不公平，并给予球队警告。
--
93 季
33 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
5 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 93 季 33 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
5 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 93 季 33 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
What the hell???? I am new to the game-received offer after trying to make several trades to improve and for some studid reason someone just decides that it was unfair???? I have no agreements outside the trade, I dont know the guy who offered the trade and now I have to receive mesage that I must be more careful? I demand appology now and you must decide on what grounds your game is based. If you want small comunity of self loving guys then stop sending ideas how to promote the game-it will never survive such a nonsence. I demand for sake of any reason for this game to be fair to reconsider and show me any rule which I have broken to be punished! And if there is not such a rule then be men enough to admit your mistakes.
--
93 季
33 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+2
This deal is way more fair than several others lately.
I really don't get it. -- 93 季 33 天
I really don't get it. -- 93 季 33 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
Lets see if they appologize and are men enough to acknowledge their mistake.
--
93 季
34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
Otherwise what use is there to make trades if someone just decides 'i dont like it'. But lets see
--
93 季
34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
2.1
Let's see, on one side we have a guy with potential RT 288, on the other side we have two old guys with potential RT 163 and 181 ......................
I don't have any other comment to add if anyone thinks it's fair trade. -- 93 季 34 天
I don't have any other comment to add if anyone thinks it's fair trade. -- 93 季 34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+4
1.1
1.1
The trade was initiated by the one who supposedly has the disadvantage.
How can it therefore be unfair?
That it is unbalanced I see, but not unfair with a warning. -- 93 季 34 天
How can it therefore be unfair?
That it is unbalanced I see, but not unfair with a warning. -- 93 季 34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
dragiux that's fine by me, but does both team benefit in this trade? I have doubts how Tartessos benefited by giving away young guy with potential for two older players who won't get much better.
--
93 季
34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
jopencjusz What's the difference here? 
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/1151398
--
93 季
34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
Can't say with 100% certanity, cause I don't remember it, but I'm pretty sure I there also voted to revert trade, similar reasoning as here, I feel it was also a little too one sided.
--
93 季
34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+1
1.1
I cannot speak on behalf of others; I can only explain the reasoning behind my personal ruling.
I vetoed this trade based on the principle of "salary drop, where one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the sole goal of reducing salaries."
Furthermore, based on Rule - Trades, point four: a team is not allowed to give away players they do not need as gifts to other teams.
This trade took place within 28 days of the season. I have sufficient reasons to believe that the purpose of RCR Tartessos proposing the trade was solely to waive the contracts of the acquired players on the 35th day in order to reduce some salary, rather than actually needing the two players they received. Therefore, it violates the aforementioned clause. If both traders resubmit the trade today, I will change my decision to approve the trade, Because RCR Tartessos will be unable to waive the players he acquired during this season.
=====
Certainly, in this trade, the trading value of Iñigo Mayorga far exceeds that of Vladimirs Karlsons and Juris Bullītis. The former is a promising and below-market-average priced player, while the latter two are substitute-level players that can be acquired at a similar price at almost any time. However, personally, I would not judge this as cheating or providing unilateral assistance. The benefits obtained by BBBeverSSS from the trade are not significant enough to warrant vetoing the trade. The impact on fair competition is relatively limited.
=====
Finally, please don't take the warning regarding trade restoration too seriously. The system interface does not provide an option to restore trades without a warning. Therefore, restoring a trade does not imply that you did something wrong or violated any rules. Often, it simply means that the trade the trade is restricted by the rules or had an impact on the overall fairness of the competition. If you have experience playing fantasy ball games, you may know that many leagues require other players to vote on whether a trade should be approved because it affects the overall competitive environment. I believe the existence of the FPC in BP is based on similar reasons. -- 93 季 34 天
I vetoed this trade based on the principle of "salary drop, where one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the sole goal of reducing salaries."
Furthermore, based on Rule - Trades, point four: a team is not allowed to give away players they do not need as gifts to other teams.
This trade took place within 28 days of the season. I have sufficient reasons to believe that the purpose of RCR Tartessos proposing the trade was solely to waive the contracts of the acquired players on the 35th day in order to reduce some salary, rather than actually needing the two players they received. Therefore, it violates the aforementioned clause. If both traders resubmit the trade today, I will change my decision to approve the trade, Because RCR Tartessos will be unable to waive the players he acquired during this season.
=====
Certainly, in this trade, the trading value of Iñigo Mayorga far exceeds that of Vladimirs Karlsons and Juris Bullītis. The former is a promising and below-market-average priced player, while the latter two are substitute-level players that can be acquired at a similar price at almost any time. However, personally, I would not judge this as cheating or providing unilateral assistance. The benefits obtained by BBBeverSSS from the trade are not significant enough to warrant vetoing the trade. The impact on fair competition is relatively limited.
=====
Finally, please don't take the warning regarding trade restoration too seriously. The system interface does not provide an option to restore trades without a warning. Therefore, restoring a trade does not imply that you did something wrong or violated any rules. Often, it simply means that the trade the trade is restricted by the rules or had an impact on the overall fairness of the competition. If you have experience playing fantasy ball games, you may know that many leagues require other players to vote on whether a trade should be approved because it affects the overall competitive environment. I believe the existence of the FPC in BP is based on similar reasons. -- 93 季 34 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+4