新闻发布中心
球队提出了交易报价
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易完成后效力新球队
--
90 季
25 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易完成后效力新球队
--
90 季
25 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
交易被公平竞争委员会撤销
--
90 季
29 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
公平竞赛委员会决定交易不公平,并给予球队警告。
--
90 季
29 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 90 季 29 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 90 季 29 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0
As FPC members may not comment the decisions made, I would like to share the reasoning behind the decision made.
Maniacs gave away a top class 421 RT defender at discounted salary which is helpful to Monarch, and got a 315 peak RT youth in return that is unlikely to reach WL1 level. The fact that Maniacs also save 22.000 weekly salary makes this trade unfair by the FPC vote.
We would like to encourage the teams making the trades that may look suspicious to describe the reasoning of the trade when making it. By providing more information about the trade to FPC will help the committee to make a better informed decision. In addition, we are encouraging FPC to have a discussion prior making the vote so the decision made is well-discussed. -- 90 季 31 天
Maniacs gave away a top class 421 RT defender at discounted salary which is helpful to Monarch, and got a 315 peak RT youth in return that is unlikely to reach WL1 level. The fact that Maniacs also save 22.000 weekly salary makes this trade unfair by the FPC vote.
We would like to encourage the teams making the trades that may look suspicious to describe the reasoning of the trade when making it. By providing more information about the trade to FPC will help the committee to make a better informed decision. In addition, we are encouraging FPC to have a discussion prior making the vote so the decision made is well-discussed. -- 90 季 31 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+1
As far as I see, you are not a member of FPC. Could I ask, how did you come to this conclusion? Asked all the members about their reasoning?
--
90 季
31 天
--
(翻译)
(翻译 EN)
+0