新闻发布中心

Icon 交易/租借球员: Almorranas & CB CUCALÓN
-- 79 季 1 天
球队提出了交易报价
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员: Guillermo Pazos
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
接受交易报价 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
WTF?? -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+2
We change a future promise with POT 9 and a filler, for a PG with 60% potential in health (100% after season update), 12 in speed, diq and passing and oiq, 8 in dribbling and 11 in experience (he may last years), and for a really good SG with 12 in jump and T3, 11 in speed, 10 in experience. Both spanish, for mantaining the national quote.
Almorranas needs my experienced PG and SG for trying to promote to WL3 as soon as possible, he needs players for today, and he knows that he may risk something to get what he currently needs.
-- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
My project is to reach WL3 asap, because i need to build my club's structure with a high-performance YT and start investing in scouted coaches. I need players with inmediate performance, and the players that i'm receiving have +60% and +25% in his inner health potential, so that they may last for years after they would be 30. In fact, Tablares has already more than 300 extra health points, so they may be very experienced.

In my school, i already have many players with a great future: 4 with POT 8, 2 with POT 7 and 3 with POT 6. I'm only trading one player to make my project real, my future is guaranteed with my current school players.

Pavieta is just a filler to adjust salaries, so it is in fact a 2x1 trade.

I attach Zubiaga's inner potentials. Despite his height, he is not a Center or PF (his skills are more accurate for a PG or a SG):

Potentials of skills
H Jmp Spd Tgh 1 2c 2m 3 Reb CS DIQ Drb Ast OIQ Exp
+25% +10% -10% -50% +10% -50% -50% -5% Avg +5% +15% +30% +20% +50%

Hope FPC may understand my current needs.
Regards
-- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+1
这笔交易被举报不公平。然而,公平竞争委员会认为这笔交易是公平的。 -- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 9<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
-- 79 季 1 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0