Press conference

Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


Trade offer accepted
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0

So which side is unfair? Can the whistleblower be asked to give a reason? Otherwise, it's just an unwise report
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0

That's why I've been WL3 in 5 seasons and WL2 in 7 seasons, and the unintelligent whistleblower can only hide in the shadows and cry
--
103 s
2 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2


This is crazy. Should we revoke the reporting rights of those who abuse the system to unfairly report transactions?
--
103 s
3 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2


This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
103 s
3 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 103 s 3 Dita
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 103 s 3 Dita
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0